📚 Substack Writing Research

Patterns from Top LP/GP/Founder Writers

💡
Key Finding: Top Substack writers are unconsciously following your essay framework. This validates your structure — you can execute with precision where they rely on instinct.

📊 Research Overview

Articles Analyzed: 16 Substack posts from 10+ authors

Focus: TOV, structure, storytelling, engagement, frameworks

Total Analysis: 40,000+ words

📄 Read Full Research on GitHub →

🎯 6 Core Patterns

These patterns appear across all top-performing articles:

✍️ Top Authors Analyzed

💬 Best Quote Examples (Study These)

"Tourists chase cycles. Locals build through them."
— Nikunj K, "Stop Being a Tourist"
"Each emerging manager looking to raise from LPs should have a very clear raison d'etre."
— Jordan Nel, "Unbundling One"
"Great technologies and great investments are not always the same thing, especially at euphoric valuations."
— Edelweiss, "Dot-Com Bubble vs AI Boom"
"We can and should automate toil, but we must preserve craft."
— Minutes, "Craft Is the Antidote to Slop"
"The question isn't 'have they got it all figured out?' but rather 'are these people uniquely capable of figuring it out?'"
— Jordan Nel, "An LP's Guide"

🎯 Application for Your Writing

Your Unfair Advantages:

How to Deploy:

Demonstrate these through specific stories, not claims. Use proper nouns:

📖 Key Frameworks Extracted

1. The 8-Factor GP Framework (Jordan Nel)

Every GP must: source, pick, win, value, construct portfolio, king-make, raise capital, sell positions.

2. Arbitrage Window Thesis (Jordan Nel)

Find where capital is NOT flowing, assess talent/company quality, time entry for low prices + less competition.

3. Bubble Detection Checklist (Edelweiss)

5 indicators: valuations far from reality, capital flooding "just in case", few profitable use cases, perpetual disruption, creative financing.

4. Two-Type Fundraise Model (PostRound)

Attention Spikes: Team pedigree, viral traction, fast rounds.
Explainers: Require conviction building, slower, often better long-term.

5. Insider Credibility Stack

Layer lived experience → proper nouns → private knowledge → contrarian take backed by experience.

🔗 Resources

Full 40K-word Research Document →

← Back to Content Hub | ← Dashboard